Companies that diversify their logistics and use alternative routes overcome many supply chain issues.

In supply chain management, interruption inside a route of a given transport mode can notably affect the entire supply chain and, at times, even take it up to a halt. As such, company leaders like P&O Ferries CEO and Maersk CEO work hard to add flexibility within the mode of transportation they rely on in a proactive manner. For example, some businesses utilise a flexible logistics strategy that relies on numerous modes of transportation. They encourage their logistic partners to mix up their mode of transportation to add all modes: trucks, trains, motorcycles, bicycles, vessels as well as helicopters. Investing in multimodal transportation practices like a combination of train, road and maritime transport as well as considering different geographic entry points minimises the vulnerabilities and dangers associated with counting on one mode.

To avoid taking on costs, various businesses consider alternate paths. As an example, because of long delays at major worldwide ports in some African states, some companies urge shippers to build up new paths as well as traditional roads. This strategy detects and utilises other lesser-used ports. Rather than counting on a single major port, once the delivery company notice heavy traffic, they redirect items to more efficient ports across the coastline then transport them inland via rail or road. According to maritime experts, this tactic has its own advantages not only in alleviating stress on overrun hubs, but also in the economic development of growing markets. Business leaders like AD Ports Group CEO would probably agree with this view.

Having a robust supply chain strategy could make companies more resilient to supply-chain disruptions. There are two main types of supply management dilemmas: the very first is due to the supplier side, namely supplier selection, supplier relationship, supply planning, transportation and logistics. The second one deals with demand management problems. These are problems linked to product launch, manufacturer product line administration, demand preparation, item rates and advertising preparation. Therefore, what typical methods can businesses adopt to boost their capacity to maintain their operations each time a major interruption hits? According to a current study, two strategies are increasingly appearing to be effective when a disruption takes place. The initial one is known as a flexible supply base, while the second one is known as economic supply incentives. Although a lot of in the market would argue that sourcing from a sole provider cuts expenses, it can cause problems as demand varies or when it comes to an interruption. Therefore, counting on multiple suppliers can mitigate the danger connected with sole sourcing. On the other hand, economic supply incentives work when the buyer provides incentives to cause more companies to enter the marketplace. The buyer will have more freedom in this way by shifting manufacturing among manufacturers, particularly in markets where there exists a small number of manufacturers.